South Australian Ad Equates Youngsters’ Gaming with Future Gambling Problems

South Australian Ad Equates Youngsters’ Gaming with Future Gambling Problems

Some say this new ‘gaming equals gambling’ ad by the SA federal government goes past an acceptable limit

Put away that new Xbox One or PS4 it might just turn you into a gambler that is compulsive. That may not need been the message that the South Australian Government was shooting for when they created their latest campaign that is anti-gambling but it’s the one which many gamers from Australia and around the world are using away from it, especially considering that state’s previous stances that had been seen as anti-gamer.

Gambling Is No Game

The campaign that is new referred to as Gambling is not any Game, and based on what the SA national has said in yesteryear, it appears to have a fairly well-intentioned meaning behind it. The idea is that children who play games that include gambling elements like slot machines or poker games may become more likely to use up gambling habits later in life, or develop gambling problems even in their adolescence.

But the final product supplies a slightly various message. A picture of a poster from the campaign was spread throughout the Internet this showing a girl looking at an iPad while sitting at what appears to be a poker table, complete with chips and cards week. Above her there is an ominous message: ‘Gambling starts with games.’

The poster immediately sent gamers around the world into an uproar, as it seems to be connecting gaming in general to problem gambling while the idea might be to specifically target games with gambling content.

‘We’d like to say we are astonished at this sort of buzz from Southern Australia, but it is regrettably more of the same unsubstantiated panic that is moral we have become accustomed,’ stated Ron Curry, CEO associated with Interactive Games and Entertainment Association.

Strict, Stricter, Strictest

That may appear to be an overreaction if it weren’t for past actions by the SA national. For example, South Australia was certainly one of the major holdouts in incorporating a classification that is r18 video and computer games in Australia. Previous to the classification, the rating that is highest available for games was MA15+; any game that will have already been rated R18+ was affectively banned from purchase, as it was ‘Refused Classification.’ The new classification was ultimately agreed on by every state attorney general, and the R18+ classification had been introduced at the start of 2013, which includes greatly reduced the number of prohibited games in Australia.

South Australia still keeps their very own Classification Council that can speed games individually easily obtainable in the state. That plays a part that is important this new campaign, because the SA government intends to introduce guidelines that would require games with simulated gambling content to be classified as MA15+ (or possibly other regulated classifications). This could affect a surprisingly lot of games, as even unassuming games like some into the Pokemon series have featured in-game slots. MA15+ games cannot be purchased or played by those under the age of 15 without the guidance of the guardian or parent.

These aren’t the only steps being taken by the Southern Australian government as section of their Children, Technology and Gambling policy. Other initiatives range from the creation of a Watch List that will inform parents about games and apps that have gambling content, an increased exposure of teaching ‘cyber safety’ in schools, and a push to have simulated gambling be used as a factor in rating classifications at the federal level.

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Okays Revere Vote While Caesars Sues

In the latest episode of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission hearings, Revere gets a shot and Caesars sues an associate

Suffolk Downs may well have their modified casino plan approved by Revere voters but the state of Massachusetts isn’t taking their word for this. The gambling commission announced this week they’re ready to allow a Revere-only form of the Suffolk Downs casino plan to go forward, but only if race track/partner Mohegan Sun is willing to allow Revere to vote again this time on the new proposal.

New Hope for Suffolk Downs

That decision is largely a win for Suffolk Downs, which saw its hopes of an East Boston casino dashed on November 5. Voters there soundly rejected their casino proposal, which would have had all of the major buildings and parking facilities based in Boston. Nonetheless, Revere voters additionally went to the polls that day the proposed casino could have bordered Revere, and some small elements of the center would have been in their city and overwhelmingly authorized the plan that is same making a sticky situation for regulators.

That gave Suffolk Downs the idea of transferring the entire casino to Revere, one thing Revere seemed rather thrilled to accommodate. But as numerous Boston officials argued, that wasn’t what the votes had authorized on election time, also it was not fair to assume that they would be ok with a casino that is revere-only.

The Massachusetts state gambling payment finally consented with this, voting unanimously to allow a new referendum to be held. Suffolk Downs will have seven days to determine whether or otherwise not to accept this decision, with Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle saying that they will probably do this.

Beneath the new proposal, Suffolk Downs would act as the landlord regarding the new casino home, while Mohegan Sun would build, own, and operate the casino it self. The new facility would be independent of the competition track, which Suffolk Downs says would continue its current horse-racing operations.

Caesars Sues Commission Chair

Meanwhile, Caesars Entertainment the partner that is original Suffolk Downs has its own set of issues with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. Caesars was initially anticipated to be the partner for the East Boston casino project, but was dropped by the battle track after state regulators raised concerns over the business’s suitability, centered on strange allegations of a relationship with another resort team Gansevoort and their transactions with a third-party who was simply reported to have had dealings with a Russian mob figure.

Now, Caesars has filed case against gaming payment chairman Stephen Crosby, saying that he possessed a prospective conflict of interest that he failed to disclose in a timely way. This conflict of interest, they do say, affected the fairness and objectivity of the state’s review of their suitability as a gambling operator.

Crosby said earlier this week which he made all of the necessary disclosures about his relationship and business that is former with a co-owner of land that is designated for use in an Everett casino proposal by Wynn Resorts. Crosby said he would recuse himself from an evaluation of the land deal Paul that is involving Lohnes who Crosby says he has known since the 1970s.

Caesars, however, says that Crosby’s disclosures to Governor Deval Patrick and the continuing state Ethics Commission had beenn’t enough. The Wynn proposition will have to compete straight against a Suffolk Downs plan for the casino that is only in eastern Massachusetts, and thus eliminating Caesars from the competition would help the Everett proposition’s chances of gaining that license.

The Caesars lawsuit also alleges that these were held up to a standard that is different various other casino operators who were bidding for licenses in the state. The suggestion that Caesars ultimately led to Suffolk Downs parting ways using them as a casino partner, while the confusion that is resulting have now been the deciding factor in East Boston voters rejecting the casino plan.

Social Casino Index Shows Women Bet More Virtual Cash than Men

Brand New information from the Social Casino Index shows women that are american more than men online, but just whenever it’s play money.(Image: Getty)

Women in the U.S. bet 30 per cent more on online social casinos than men, which is surprising news since typically males are linked more to gambling than women. Of course, they’re just gambling with Monopoly money, so it’s easier to bet large.

The interesting data was recently released by International Game Technology (IGT), a world frontrunner in gaming systems technology, and DoubleDown Casino, that is the largest casino that is social the world.

Social casino sites are categorized as those that are on offer via social media internet sites and present players the chance to play non-wagering casino games including poker, roulette and slots. The first ever Social Casino Index released jointly by the 2 companies has utilized the statistics from more than six million people who play the DoubleDown Casino games on Facebook via their computer or device that is mobile thirty days.

Middle-Aged Ladies Lead the Play Money Pack

The statistics revealed that women are ahead of guys in gaming activities and gambled more virtual chips each session, with those between your ages of 45 and 55 years of age being the main players. These women are also more likely to bet big, as guys seemed to not bet more than 7.6 million virtual potato chips per session, whereas women were prepared to go up to 10 million whenever they played.

‘Due to the fact earth’s largest social casino, we are often seeing to better understand our players and their preferences,’ explained the vice president of global marketing at IGT Interactive Group, John Clelland. ‘The personal Casino Index gives the gaming industry a really step-by-step view social casino player choices for the time that is first. It is also fascinating to check to the similarities and huge difference in our players from shore to coast.’

As an example, the personal Casino Index showed that more than 60 % of players in Nevada were women.

Across America, those surviving in Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming had been more likely to try out at social casinos, as these locations saw the concentration that is highest of players in the nation.

Meanwhile, Hawaiians were discovered to be 20 percent much more likely to play in the move via mobile devices than the average off their states, and players from Maine had been discovered to be 25 percent less likely to want to play from a smart phone, so obviously they would rather stay put while playing.

Gambling with Faux Chips

In the real-money gambling world, it’s generally accepted that men make up nearly all the pool of the with bad gambling practices. Even Clelland stated that IGT had the ‘belief that men would make the highest bets.’ But since women are topping the chart on social casino web sites, these data will likely raise concerns among those whom see digital money gambling as a route to real-money gambling.

Although the level has maybe not yet been definitively calculated, many have already claimed that games which simulate gambling can result in real-money that is problematic habits, specially in the younger generation who could become used to clicking away, seeing their numbers go up and down, without really thinking about what they’re doing. The hope would be, of course, that they make the free slots indian dreaming distinction between virtual chips and real-money wagering if they choose to try their luck on a real online casino.